docs / familias / r

r — Analytic rubric criteria

One rubric criterion per line with k ordered performance levels (k declared in the header), a weight and the evidence to inspect.

Dominio
education / assessment
Versión
1
Padre
— (raíz)
Clave de registros
criteria
Separador de lista
,
Archivo
forks/r/contract.json

Campos por posición

#TipoDescripciónParte
idstr (unique: True)núcleo
dimensionstrnúcleo
criterionstrnúcleo
levelslistordered level descriptorsnúcleo
weightfloat (max: 1)núcleo
evidencestrnúcleo

Ejemplo válido

r|n=12|d=20260603|l=en|t=Argumentative essay|k=4|scale=0-3
r1|Argument|Thesis clarity|absent or unclear,stated but vague,clear and focused,clear\, focused and original|0.2|Introduction paragraph
r2|Argument|Use of evidence|no evidence,evidence unrelated to claims,relevant evidence,relevant\, well-integrated evidence|0.2|Body paragraphs
r3|Argument|Counterarguments|ignored,mentioned,addressed,addressed and refuted|0.1|Discussion section
r4|Structure|Organization|disorganized,partially organized,logical order,logical order with transitions|0.1|Whole essay
r5|Structure|Paragraphing|no paragraphs,inconsistent,one idea per paragraph,purposeful paragraphing|0.05|Whole essay
r6|Language|Grammar and mechanics|frequent errors,several errors,few errors,error-free|0.1|Whole essay
r7|Language|Academic register|informal,mixed,mostly academic,consistently academic|0.05|Whole essay
r8|Sources|Citation accuracy|missing,inconsistent,mostly correct,correct APA/IEEE|0.1|Reference list
r9|Sources|Source quality|unreliable,mixed,reliable,peer-reviewed and recent|0.05|Reference list
r10|Critical thinking|Analysis depth|descriptive only,some analysis,consistent analysis,insightful analysis|0.03|Body paragraphs
r11|Critical thinking|Synthesis|none,lists ideas,connects ideas,builds new insight|0.01|Conclusion
r12|Presentation|Formatting|not followed,partially,mostly,fully compliant|0.01|Document

Cárgalo en el playground o valida con mini validate forks/r/fixtures/valid.mini.

Notas de la familia

.mini-r — Analytic rubric criteria#

Prefix: r Version: 1 Parent:Domain: education / assessment

One rubric criterion per line with k ordered performance levels (k declared in the header), a weight and the evidence to inspect.

Record layout#

id:str | dimension:str | criterion:str | levels:list<str> | weight:float[0..1] | evidence:str
# field type notes
1 id str core
2 dimension str core
3 criterion str core
4 levels list<str> core; ordered level descriptors
5 weight float[0..1] core
6 evidence str core

Header keys#

key type required description
d str no generation date YYYYMMDD
l str no language code
t str no
k int yes number of performance levels
scale str no
n int yes number of records
v int no contract version

Example#

r|n=12|d=20260603|l=en|t=Argumentative essay|k=4|scale=0-3
r1|Argument|Thesis clarity|absent or unclear,stated but vague,clear and focused,clear\, focused and original|0.2|Introduction paragraph
r2|Argument|Use of evidence|no evidence,evidence unrelated to claims,relevant evidence,relevant\, well-integrated evidence|0.2|Body paragraphs
…

Fixtures#

fixtures/valid.minifixtures/canonical.json (round-trip), fixtures/escaping.minifixtures/escaping.json, and the negative cases bad_count.mini, bad_arity.mini, bad_type.mini.

Prompt block#

Generate the transferable specification with mini prompt r.